The Prager University Foundation, known for its conservative stance, has ignited a firestorm with its latest ad campaign on X. As part of a $1 million effort, PragerU launched a “takeover” ad to promote “Detrans: The Dangers of Gender-Affirming Care,” a film that has garnered considerable controversy for its critical stance on transition-related care for transgender individuals.
Film Focus and Backlash
The 21-minute documentary features stories of two adults who detransitioned, shifting their identity from transgender to their birth gender. These narratives are set against a backdrop of increasing legislative actions against transition-related care for minors. PragerU’s move to advertise on X follows the platform’s lean towards more conservative content under the ownership of Elon Musk. The ad’s placement on X was strategic, taking advantage of the platform’s reduced censorship on such topics.
Judicial and Medical Opinions
Critics of the film, including more than a dozen major medical associations, argue that it misrepresents the experiences of transgender individuals, focusing on a minority who regret their transition. The medical community, including organizations like the American Medical Association, largely supports access to gender-affirming care, opposing restrictive laws.
YouTube’s Different Approach
In contrast to X, YouTube declined PragerU’s request for a similar ad placement, adhering to its policies on political topic advertisements. The documentary has also faced rejection from multiple film festivals, highlighting the polarizing nature of its content.
Detransitioning: A Minority Phenomenon
Critics point out that “Detrans” centers on rare cases of detransitioning, while the majority of transgender individuals report positive outcomes from transitioning. Studies suggest only a small percentage, around 1%, experience regret following gender-affirming surgery.
The Documentary’s Approach
“Detrans” has been criticized for potentially misleading content, including presenting one of its main characters, Daisy Strongin, in a way that obscures her actual age at the time of transition. The film also discusses a lawsuit against the Kaiser Hospital Foundation without direct interviews with the involved parties.
Medical Community’s Stance
Despite the documentary’s claims, the medical community continues to support individualized, consent-based gender-affirming care for minors, following guidelines from professional associations devoted to transgender health.
Social Media Responses
The ad on X evoked mixed reactions, with some praising the film and others condemning it for spreading harmful misinformation. Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, criticized the decision to host such content on X, highlighting the potential danger it poses to the transgender community in an already volatile environment.
PragerU’s Perspective
PragerU’s chief marketing officer, Craig Strazzeri, justified the ad placement on X, citing the platform’s expansive reach and less restrictive content policies under Musk’s leadership. The organization hopes the film will shed light on what they perceive as the risks associated with gender-affirming care, especially for minors.
The Aftermath of the Takeover
The campaign’s impact on X and the broader conversation around transgender rights and healthcare remains a subject of intense debate, reflecting the ongoing cultural and political divisions surrounding LGBTQ issues.
©loveinclusion.org
